Pieter Levels, also known as Levels.io, is a self-taught developer and entrepreneur renowned for designing and running over 40 startups, often single-handedly. His work, characterized by a rapid, iterative approach and a commitment to transparency, has earned him recognition in the indie hacker community. Living a digital nomad lifestyle, he has combined coding expertise with a passion for documenting his entrepreneurial journey across more than 150 cities worldwide.
Pieter Levels: Programming, Viral AI Startups, and Digital Nomad Life | Lex Fridman Podcast #440
Pieter Levels prefers a self-reliant, scrappy approach to building startups, doing everything himself, including design, development, and marketing. He avoids venture capital (VC) funding and instead rapidly builds and launches products to quickly test if there's demand.
Rapid Iteration: He emphasizes the importance of quickly validating ideas by launching products within weeks and seeing if people are willing to pay for them. Most of his ideas fail, but this rapid iteration allows him to find the successful ones.
Avoiding Bureaucracy: Pieter contrasts his approach with large tech companies like Google, criticizing them for being slow due to bureaucracy. He values the speed and freedom of working alone, which allows him to launch products quickly without needing approval from others.
Physical Labor and Creativity: He believes in the therapeutic value of physical labor, drawing parallels between his father's constant home renovations and his own continuous cycle of building startups. For Pieter, the process and challenge of creation are more fulfilling than the end result.
Happiness Over Scale: Pieter is more interested in the fun and creativity of building products than in scaling them into large companies. He notes that many founders who become CEOs miss the hands-on work that made them happy and often find the managerial role less fulfilling.
Respect for Elon Musk: Pieter admires Elon Musk for using investor money to build tangible products, contrasting this with what he perceives as shady financial practices in the VC world. He respects Musk’s focus on actual building rather than financial maneuvers.
Building as Therapy: Pieter discusses how building startups has helped him through low points in his life, similar to how physical labor provides a sense of purpose and therapy.
Post-University Low Point: After graduating from university in Holland, Pieter found himself in a difficult place. He didn't want a typical job and was making some money through YouTube, but he felt disconnected from his friends who had settled into traditional careers.
Loneliness and Depression: Pieter struggled with a sense of aimlessness, especially after trying digital nomadism in Asia. He felt isolated and depressed, uncertain about his future, and comparing himself unfavorably to his friends back in Holland.
Turning Point: At his lowest point, Pieter's father advised him to combat his depression by staying active—literally by shoveling sand or doing something productive. This advice led Pieter to start building startups.
12 Startups in 12 Months: Pieter began a project called "12 Startups in 12 Months," where he committed to creating and launching a new project every month. He focused on building products quickly and testing them with real users who could pay for them.
Importance of Action: Pieter's approach to overcoming his low points was rooted in taking action rather than passively waiting for things to improve. This hands-on, project-based work helped him find purpose and direction.
Stripe for Payments: Pieter emphasized how essential Stripe was in enabling him to quickly monetize his projects. He contrasted this with the difficulties he faced in his earlier years trying to set up a merchant account, highlighting how Stripe's simplicity and ease of use were game-changers for entrepreneurs.
Early Development Skills: Pieter started with basic coding skills, learned through creating websites for his YouTube channel. His early work involved using Flash and ActionScript, which were popular technologies at the time.
12 Startups in 12 Months: Pieter committed to launching 12 startups in 12 months. This project was designed to help him learn to code more effectively while also staying productive. The time constraint forced him to focus on building minimal viable products (MVPs) quickly.
First Startup - Play My Inbox: Pieter’s first project was an app called "Play My Inbox," which scraped Gmail for YouTube links and organized them into a gallery. Although it didn’t make money, it gained significant user traction and media attention.
Challenges and Scrappiness: Building a startup in 30 days required Pieter to prioritize ruthlessly. He focused on the essentials, such as a simple product, landing page, and payment system. He avoided complex features like secure login systems, opting for simpler solutions to save time.
Marketing and Monetization: Pieter discussed the difficulty of monetizing small tools, like Chrome extensions or plugins. People often expect these to be free, making it hard to generate revenue from them. He emphasized the importance of understanding the market and how to position and promote a product, particularly in communities like Reddit.
Scrappy Product Development: Pieter highlighted the importance of keeping the development process scrappy and focusing on what can be done quickly. He aimed to solve real problems and get a product in front of users as fast as possible, even if the initial version was far from perfect.
Depression and Loneliness: Levels talks about how feeling like a "loser" is common, especially when you're young, broke, and lacking direction in life. He emphasizes that it's important to push through these feelings and build a life for yourself, as having meaningful connections and a purpose can help alleviate depression.
Challenges of the Digital Nomad Lifestyle: Levels explains that the digital nomad lifestyle can lead to feelings of isolation and anxiety. Constant travel can be mentally taxing, especially when you're far from home and detached from your culture. He mentions that some digital nomads have even taken their own lives due to the pressures and loneliness of this lifestyle.
Shady Businesses in Early Digital Nomadism: In the early days of digital nomadism, Levels encountered people engaging in questionable business practices, such as selling illegal drugs or running shady e-commerce operations. This made him feel out of place, as he was more focused on building legitimate startups.
Freedom vs. Constraints: While the digital nomad lifestyle offers a sense of freedom, Levels notes that too much freedom can lead to a feeling of being lost. He argues that constraints, such as responsibilities and connections, can actually make people happier.
Romanticizing the Nomadic Life: Despite the challenges, Levels acknowledges the romantic aspect of the digital nomad lifestyle. He fondly recalls working late nights in co-working spaces with friends, fueled by caffeine and techno music. However, he also admits that this lifestyle didn't make him truly happy.
Favorite Places: Levels mentions Thailand, particularly Bangkok and Chiang Mai, as some of his favorite places due to the friendly people, affordable cost of living, and overall quality of life.
Danger and Authenticity: Levels and Fridman discuss the appeal of danger in certain cities and how it can reveal something about oneself and others. Levels expresses a preference for the authenticity of more dangerous or "broken" areas over luxury.
Transition to a Different Life: Levels reflects on how his life has changed, now traveling with his girlfriend and leading a more settled life. While he has moved on from the nomadic lifestyle, he still finds it romantic and full of memorable experiences.
Identifying Problems: Levels emphasizes the importance of spotting problems in everyday life as a way to generate startup ideas. He suggests making a list of daily annoyances or inefficiencies and considering which ones could be solved with a technological solution.
Idea Generation: To come up with good ideas, Levels recommends being open to problems around you, both in your personal life and in different environments. He also mentions the importance of living an interesting life, such as through travel, which exposes you to new problems and solutions that might not exist in your own country.
Learning from Other Markets: Traveling can reveal innovative solutions in other countries that haven’t been implemented in your own. For example, Levels talks about how Asia had "everything apps" long before they became popular in the West. This concept of "arbitrage" involves bringing successful ideas from one market to another.
Uncomfortable Situations as Inspiration: Travel often involves discomfort, such as dealing with airports or long flights. These experiences can highlight problems that need solving, offering fertile ground for new ideas.
Technology-Driven Ideas: While initially focused on problem-solving, Levels also discusses the potential of new technologies like AI. He mentions how technologies like Stable Diffusion and ChatGPT sparked his interest not because they solved a specific problem he had, but because they opened up new possibilities for creation.
Risk of Tech-First Approaches: Levels warns against starting with a technology and then trying to find a problem it can solve. This approach, while tempting, often leads to failure because it doesn’t address a genuine need.
Photo AI Concept: Levels explains that Photo AI enables users to create AI-generated photos by training a model on a set of their own images. The model can then generate photos with different expressions, clothing, and poses based on text prompts.
Technical Implementation: The platform uses a service called Replicate for hosting and compute. Users can upload images to train the model, which can then generate new photos based on user-specified prompts.
Challenges with AI Models: Levels mentions the challenges of generating photorealistic images, particularly how some AI models were initially trained on inappropriate content like porn, which affects the realism and accuracy of the generated images. He highlights the need for filtering and prompting the AI to avoid generating inappropriate content.
Development Stack: Levels shares that he uses a simple tech stack for his projects, primarily relying on PHP, jQuery, HTML, and SQLite. Despite the prevalence of modern frameworks, he finds that sticking with what he knows allows him to develop and launch projects quickly.
Philosophy on Frameworks: Levels and Fridman discuss the trade-offs between using simple, well-known technologies versus adopting the latest frameworks. Levels argues that many modern frameworks are complex and can slow down development, while sticking to simpler tools allows for faster iteration and product launches.
AI’s Imperfection: Levels acknowledges that while AI-generated content is improving, it’s still far from perfect. He stresses that despite the hype, AI models often produce flawed results, which is a significant challenge for AI startups.
Controversial Take on Simplicity: Levels suggests that simpler, vanilla coding methods might be more efficient for building startups, contrasting this with the trend of using complex frameworks, which he believes can sometimes complicate development unnecessarily.
In this conversation between Lex Fridman and Pieter Levels, they discuss the development and challenges of Photo AI and Pieter’s approach to building tech startups. Here are the key points:
Monetary Incentives and Frameworks: Pieter Levels highlights the financial incentives behind promoting complex frameworks and platforms. He suggests that companies push these technologies to developers to create dependency, resulting in higher costs for hosting and using the platforms. He expresses skepticism about the need for such frameworks, arguing that simpler, established technologies like PHP can be just as effective.
Suspicion of Developer Influencers: Levels notes that developer influencers, similar to influencers in other fields like fitness, are often paid to promote certain frameworks or platforms. He questions the authenticity of these promotions, pointing out that simpler solutions often work just as well, if not better.
Photo AI Origin: Photo AI originated from Levels’ experimentation with Stable Diffusion, an early generative image model. He started by generating various images, including architectural designs, which led to the creation of the website This House Does Not Exist. His success with generating AI images for houses and interiors eventually led him to experiment with generating AI images of himself, which evolved into Photo AI.
Pivot to Interior AI: After finding success with generating house designs, Pieter pivoted to creating Interior AI, which allowed users to upload photos of their interiors and generate design variations. This project became a significant success, generating substantial revenue, which demonstrated the commercial potential of AI-driven design tools.
Avatar AI and Viral Success: Pieter further developed the technology to create Avatar AI, allowing users to generate stylized avatars of themselves. This concept went viral and generated significant income in a short period. However, larger companies quickly replicated the idea and created more polished versions, such as Lenza, which became a top-grossing app.
Reflection on Competition: While Pieter initially felt some disappointment when larger companies quickly capitalized on his ideas, he ultimately views it as a positive development, recognizing the potential and scalability of AI technologies in the broader market.
Initial Competition and Product Development:
Challenges in AI Photo Generation:
Launch and Rapid Growth:
Industry Impact and AI Platforms:
Insights on Human Perception and AI:
Advice on Photography and AI:
Learning AI:
Building AI Models:
Open Source in AI:
Idea Generation and Implementation:
Refinement of Ideas:
They discuss the challenges and philosophical aspects of building robotics companies, the nature of personal growth, and practical advice for starting projects. Here are the key points:
Challenges in Robotics:
Technology Seeking Solutions:
Current Robotics:
Sense of Purpose:
Living Life with Flexibility:
Lessons from Psychedelics:
Starting Simple:
Crowdsourcing:
Technology and Market Validation:
Concept and Creation:
Challenges and Solutions:
Development Journey:
Cultural Impact:
Concept and Motivation:
Growth and Success:
Project Philosophy:
Effective Learning:
Building Projects:
Building in Public:
Promotion and User Acquisition:
Philosophy on Progress:
Monetization Strategies:
Cost Management:
Handling Free Users and Spam:
Dealing with Criticism and Internet Culture:
Promotion and Visibility:
Personal Experience: Pieter has never sold a company, which he views as a missed opportunity. Despite being involved in many acquisition discussions, he has not finalized a sale.
Challenges with Acquisitions: Pieter describes the acquisition process as often frustrating, with potential buyers frequently changing the valuation or price after the initial agreement. This is seen as a common negotiation tactic.
Financial Perspective: Pieter’s companies have high profit margins (around 90%). Given the multiples for valuation (e.g., three to five times revenue or profit), he finds it financially advantageous to wait rather than sell, as the potential return would be similar if he waits a few years.
Emotional Attachment: Pieter feels a strong emotional connection to his companies, particularly his first successful product. He values the mission of his projects, which often involves community and cultural exchange, making it hard for him to consider selling.
Future Prospects: While he finds AI projects less emotionally significant, he is open to the idea of selling them if the price is right.
Post-Sale Depression: Pieter acknowledges that selling a company can lead to a sense of loss or depression, as seen with others who have sold their startups. He believes that continuing to work on new and exciting projects can help avoid this issue.
Preference for Solo Work: Pieter prefers working alone because he doesn’t trust others to deliver the quality of work he expects. He dislikes the consensus-driven approach often seen in team meetings, which he believes leads to average results.
Trust Issues: Pieter expresses a lack of trust in others' ability to do a great job and is wary of compromise-driven decision-making, which he feels dilutes creativity and excellence.
Working with Trusted Partners: Despite his general preference for solo work, Pieter makes exceptions for trusted individuals. He collaborates with his best friend Andre on an AI startup, where they divide roles: Andre codes while Pieter handles product strategy and promotion.
Challenges with Hiring Developers: Pieter recounts a past experience where hiring a developer led to disagreements and inefficiencies. The developer wanted to rewrite Pieter’s existing codebase, which Pieter felt would have been too time-consuming and disruptive.
Code Empathy: Pieter values developers who can deeply understand and respect the existing codebase, showing empathy towards the style and approach used. He emphasizes the importance of hiring top-tier developers who can adapt to and integrate with his coding style.
Finding the Right Talent: Pieter finds it challenging to find high-quality developers and acknowledges that many are average at their jobs. He believes that successful collaboration requires finding developers who are not only technically skilled but also culturally and stylistically compatible.
Evolving Technologies: Pieter discusses the evolving nature of programming languages like PHP and JavaScript, noting that improvements in these technologies have made them more efficient and powerful.
Fast Shipping: Pieter emphasizes the benefits of shipping code quickly. He prefers to deploy directly to production, skipping staging environments, to make changes and fixes faster.
Iteration and Deployment: Pieter describes his iterative approach to design and development. He frequently makes small changes and deploys them immediately, which allows him to address issues quickly and keep his projects dynamic.
Design Philosophy: Pieter’s design style is described as rich in information, contrasting with minimalist design which often conveys little information. He aims to deliver a lot of useful content in a clean and stylish manner, even if it appears busy or complex.
Emojis and User Interface: Pieter incorporates emojis into his user interface to add a memorable and engaging element, helping users navigate and understand the content better.
Handling Bugs and Feedback: Pieter values quick responses to bugs and user feedback, contrasting this with larger companies where bug fixes can be slow and cumbersome. He finds it frustrating when bug reports lead to lengthy delays.
Challenges in Large Organizations: Pieter criticizes large organizations for their slow development cycles and bureaucratic processes. He suggests that a more dictatorial approach, where priorities are set decisively, could lead to faster progress.
Legal and Organizational Constraints: Pieter notes that big companies often face legal and bureaucratic constraints that can slow down innovation. He contrasts this with smaller teams or solo developers who can move quickly and adapt without these obstacles.
Inspirational Examples: Pieter references leaders like Steve Jobs, who were known for pushing through barriers and prioritizing rapid development, even if it meant ignoring traditional constraints and processes.
IDE Preference: Pieter uses VS Code, having switched from Sublime Text due to community pressure and personal exploration. He appreciates features like multi-cursor editing in Sublime but finds VS Code sufficient and effective for his needs.
Tool Skepticism: Pieter is skeptical about the importance of specific tools, believing that familiarity with any tool can lead to high productivity. He emphasizes the importance of knowing shortcuts and functionalities over the tool's specifics.
Learning New Technologies: Pieter advocates for continually learning and experimenting with new technologies, even if they are not immediately useful. He believes this helps expand understanding and keeps skills fresh.
Exploring Frameworks: Pieter is interested in learning frameworks like React and Next.js but feels that it's challenging to start with these technologies. He suggests experimenting with various frameworks by building simple projects to understand their practical applications and differences.
Building Frameworks: Pieter often builds his own frameworks and tools, which he finds helpful in understanding the underlying concepts and challenges.
Focus on Impact: Pieter prioritizes learning technologies that offer the most impact, such as AI, over front-end frameworks. He acknowledges that learning new frameworks can be beneficial but often focuses on what aligns best with his current goals.
Benchmarking Frameworks: Pieter suggests an interesting approach of benchmarking different frameworks by building a single web page with dynamic elements in various technologies. This could help compare efficiency, development speed, and personal satisfaction.
Advice on Learning: Pieter considers hiring experienced developers to learn from their expertise as a potential way to accelerate learning. He notes that such interactions should be collaborative rather than dogmatic to gain the most benefit.
Andrej Karpathy's Teaching: Pieter admires Andrej Karpathy's ability to explain complex topics, like making LLMs, in a simple, understandable way. He suggests that having Karpathy as a mentor would be amazing due to his technical expertise and clear explanations.
Frameworks vs. Building from Scratch: Pieter contemplates whether learning frameworks is worthwhile. He considers that learning frameworks might be a way to understand underlying concepts but not necessarily something to use long-term. He also reflects that some experts, like Karpathy, prefer building from scratch and may be skeptical of frameworks.
Switching to Mac: Pieter shares his transition from Windows to Mac in 2015, highlighting that it significantly improved his productivity and life. He appreciates Mac's design and Unix-based system but mentions some drawbacks, like Finder compared to Windows Explorer.
Windows vs. Mac: Lex and Pieter discuss the pros and cons of both systems. Lex is considering switching to Mac but values the flexibility of Windows. Pieter argues that while Mac might have some limitations, its integration with Unix-like environments and hardware design can enhance productivity.
Working Setup: Pieter describes his shift from a highly ergonomic setup with multiple screens to a simpler setup using just a 16-inch MacBook. He finds that working on a couch with a laptop works well for him, reducing repetitive strain injuries (RSI) and improving comfort.
Minimalist Approach: Pieter appreciates the constraints of working with a single screen and minimal setup. He contrasts this with having multiple screens and extensive gear, suggesting that too much equipment might hinder productivity rather than help.
Productivity and Constraints: Pieter and Lex discuss how constraints, like using a single screen or minimal setup, can enhance focus and productivity. Pieter expresses skepticism about the need for more tools and screens, noting that sometimes "less is more."
Gear Acquisition Syndrome: Pieter reflects on the tendency for people to accumulate excessive gear and tools, which does not necessarily translate to increased productivity. He values a more minimalist approach, emphasizing that simplicity can sometimes be more effective.
Typical Day: Pieter usually goes to bed around 2 a.m. and wakes up around 10 a.m. He starts his day with coffee, made using a V60 filter, and then spends time coding and managing bugs. He can handle interruptions better now and finds that constraints, like having less time, can improve productivity.
Productive Sessions: Pieter describes his most productive days as ones where he has minimal distractions. On these days, he can code for extended periods, sometimes staying up all night if he's deeply engaged in a project. He also mentions that having alone time in a hotel or quiet space helps him focus and be more productive.
Coding Environment: Pieter enjoys coding with minimal distractions and values having a streamlined setup. He used to work with multiple screens but now prefers working on a single laptop, which he finds more effective. He listens to techno music while coding, which he finds less distracting compared to other genres.
Music and Noise: Pieter and Lex discuss different types of audio for focus. Pieter uses techno music and finds it helps him stay locked in, while Lex uses brown noise, which he feels enhances concentration by masking distractions.
Social and Distraction Management: Pieter prefers working alone or with minimal interruptions and uses strategies like fines for distractions in coworking spaces to maintain focus. He values the ability to work in silence or with a close friend who also focuses deeply.
Sleep and Naps: Pieter doesn't take naps and feels he doesn't need them due to his regular exercise routine, which keeps him alert throughout the day. Lex also mentions the importance of understanding personal limits and being a student of one's own body and mind.
Diet and Fasting: Both Pieter and Lex have found that fewer meals a day can work better for them than the traditional advice of eating multiple meals. Pieter finds that eating once or twice a day suits him better and supports his strength and well-being.
In this conversation, Lex Fridman and Pieter Levels discuss minimalism and the experiences of embracing a minimalist lifestyle:
Personal Journey: Pieter recounts how he embraced minimalism about ten years ago, inspired by trends like the "100 Things Challenge." His experience was significantly influenced by an MDMA trip, which he felt pushed him towards decluttering his life and possessions.
Process and Challenges: He describes the process of downsizing, including selling items through eBay and the diverse people he encountered during this process. Selling his Canon 5D camera, which symbolized the end of a chapter in his life, was a particularly memorable and emotional experience.
Lessons Learned: Pieter highlights that minimalism teaches you to value experiences over possessions and provides freedom to move and live more flexibly. He contrasts owning material things with relying on services, like using Uber instead of owning a car.
Value of Travel: Pieter advocates for traveling, especially at a young age, to gain experiences and insights. He suggests that traveling can provide a more valuable education than traditional university, helping individuals to understand themselves and the world better.
Balancing Outcasts and Normies: Pieter and Lex discuss the balance between being an outcast and fitting into society. Pieter acknowledges that while being unconventional can be interesting, learning to adapt to societal norms is also important.
Minimalist Essentials: When Pieter minimized his possessions, he was left with just a backpack, a MacBook, some clothes, and basic necessities. He found that minimalism, especially in places with warm climates, was practical and liberating.
Hedonistic Adaptation: Pieter and Lex discuss how people quickly adapt to new possessions and experiences, diminishing their long-term satisfaction. They argue that focusing on meaningful experiences and relationships rather than material goods leads to more lasting happiness.
The Minimalist Mindset: Pieter's journey into minimalism made him reflect on what truly brings joy and fulfillment. He concludes that while minimalism suits him, others might find happiness in material possessions, and both paths can be valid depending on personal preferences.
Here are the key points from the conversation between Lex Fridman and Pieter Levels:
Managing Communications: Pieter discusses the difficulty of managing numerous messages and requests. He initially closed his DMs to handle the volume and faced criticism for it. He acknowledges the challenge of balancing his time and the emotional toll of not being able to connect with everyone.
Personal Boundaries: He emphasizes that while he receives both valuable and distressing messages, he can’t respond to everyone due to time constraints.
Effective Help: Pieter reflects on his experience helping others, noting that people who are proactive and self-driven tend to succeed. He mentions a friend who thrived because of his own motivation and ability to learn independently.
Procrastination and Self-Reliance: He sees people seeking external advice as a form of procrastination. True growth comes from taking action and learning through personal experience rather than just asking for advice.
Time Analysis: Pieter and Lex discuss the importance of analyzing how time is spent. Pieter describes his process of breaking down his day to identify time wastage and focus on productive activities.
Deep Work: Both agree on the challenge of finding uninterrupted time for deep, focused work and the need to eliminate distractions.
Life’s Limited Time: They discuss the sobering realization of life’s finite nature, such as the limited number of times one will see loved ones. This awareness can be both motivating and unsettling.
Friendship Dynamics: Pieter reflects on how friendships evolve over time. While some friends remain close despite infrequent contact, others drift away. The essence of true friendship, he believes, is the ability to count on each other even after long periods of separation.
Impact of Fame: Pieter touches on the effects of increasing fame on his life and relationships, hinting at the broader changes it brings.
Authenticity in Sharing: Pieter values being open and authentic on Twitter, sharing both personal and technical aspects of his work. He believes that transparency and sharing real-life experiences make people more relatable and interesting.
Public Pressure: He notes that as he becomes more popular, he feels less pressure to conform to a more polished or collected persona. He finds that being genuine and unfiltered resonates better with people.
Historical Context: Pieter draws parallels between modern coffeehouses and their historical role in fostering creativity and collaboration during the Enlightenment. He sees cafés as vital spaces for work and serendipitous interactions, unlike more sterile co-working spaces.
European vs. American Café Culture: Pieter contrasts European cafés, where laptop use is often restricted, with American cafés that are seen as hubs for work and innovation. He believes that Europe's restrictive approach limits entrepreneurial energy.
European Entrepreneurial Spirit: Pieter expresses concern over the decline of entrepreneurial spirit in Europe, attributing it to outdated regulations and a dominance of older, established companies. He hopes for a revival of a more dynamic and innovative culture in Europe.
Regulatory Challenges: He discusses how heavy regulation in Europe stifles new startups compared to the more flexible environment in the U.S. This regulatory burden makes it difficult for new businesses, especially in emerging fields like AI.
Project Highlights: Pieter reflects on his various projects, both successful and not, and emphasizes learning from the process rather than just focusing on outcomes.
Personal Growth: He discusses how sharing his journey, including failures and successes, has helped him and others understand the broader picture of entrepreneurship and innovation.
Positive Outlook on Technology: Pieter supports the Effective Accelerationist movement, which promotes a positive view of technology as a solution to societal challenges. He emphasizes that technology can drive progress and improve society, advocating for more focus on building and creating rather than fearing potential downsides.
Comparison with Historical and Global Contexts: He compares the current technological and entrepreneurial state of China with early 20th-century America, noting that rapid development often comes with significant problems. Pieter warns against complacency in Europe and encourages a proactive, ambitious approach to innovation.
European Perspective: Pieter mentions his own European version of this movement, suggesting a "Make Europe Great Again" mindset, emphasizing the need for Europe to embrace innovation and entrepreneurship.
Follow Your Own Path: Pieter advises young people to disregard societal and familial pressures and pursue their own passions and ideas. He emphasizes the importance of staying true to oneself and not being afraid to be different or unconventional.
Embrace Challenges and Persevere: He acknowledges that the path to success can be challenging and may involve setbacks. However, he believes that perseverance and a commitment to one's own vision can ultimately lead to success and fulfillment.
Encouragement to Innovate: Pieter encourages young people to lean into their unique ideas and not conform to conventional expectations, suggesting that there is room in the economy and society for diverse, innovative pursuits.